--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jun 3, 2007, at 6:56 PM, new.morning wrote: > > > --- In [email protected], Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote: > > > > > > I'm not surprised BTW that New Morn, a TB, would fall for it. > > > > > > > Wow. Vaj thinks I am a true beleiver. To read my posts and believe > > that I am a true believer is simply fantastic (as in fantasy). I am > > speechless. > > I certainly did not mean that in a disparaging way in your regard NM, > I meant it merely as an observation,
In the context of FFL, I cannot think of any instance TB has ever been used in a non-disparaging way. It certainly is not a congratulatory compliment in the FFL context. However, since you concluded that I supposedly fell for something -- which can only be viewed as disparaging, I assumed that your reasoning about the causes of my falling were related to the falling. If two unnconneced thoughts in one sentence of your claim was your intent, that indeed is interesting. No matter. What others think of me doesn't interst me much. (Though it can be good feed back if its objctive and not wrapped up with the observers personal stuff and stories). Call me any names you like if that pleases you. Its no sweat of my back. I am not this lump of clay your remarks are aimed at. I make (funny) disparaging, self-effacing and/or critical remarks about that lump of clay all the time. Self reflection and criticism are important and useful things to tear apart and look deep inside ones beliefs, thoughts, motivations, goals, behaviour, attachments, trigger points, stories, etc The only reason I commented, aside that your post made me LOL, was tht it reminded me of why I don't take some posters and their "insights" seriously, no mattter how profound they may seem -- if they come from a mind that regularly expresses non-rational conclusions, based on sliperry facts in a style of non-focussed responses. > > Utterly odd that ssomeone could read my exhanges with Judy, over time > > and today, and feel that somehow I have "fallen" for -- or abondond my > > sense of reason, logic and facts, thus irrationally suseptible to > > coming under the sway of Judy's posts. > > Well, Judy has a way, typically of dissembling, missing context and > verbal sleight of hand that fools some. You may or may not be one of > those. If I inaccurately misjudged the situation, you have my sincere > apology. Again, no aplogies needed. Call me any names, draw any conclusions you want about me. Thats not my concern. If I have a concern at all, its peoples' style of reponses that interest me -- it reflects the qualities of thier mind,attachments, inner issues, and a whole host of fascinating stuff.
