--- In [email protected], new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote: > > > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Behalf Of off_world_beings > > Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2007 6:55 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Request to Rick to burn my months posts for Ron > > Paul > > > > > > > > Just kidding about burning the months posts Rick. Just making a point > > about Ron Paul. > > > > http://youtube.com/watch?v=HA9EHrH7NKQ > > > > from what little I know about him, I agree with you. I'd vote for > him over > > some Democrats. Very cool dude. > > This is not directed at you Rick, (though if the shoe fits at least > one foot ...) but more to others I see lauding this guy. He is > interesting. > > But for those who cry and moan and belittle the Bush tax cuts -- and > intents (which turned out to be words only) for constraints > on goverment spending -- and then to applaud Paul -- is the height of > irony. Its almost surreal. > > Paul doesn't want to cut taxes -- he wants to TOTALLY eliminate income > taxes. And to do that, he would cut government spending by a third. > Given that entitlements and debt service take up a large portion of > the budget, this means most discretionary funding would be cut. Like > for education, energy policy, expanded health care, science resarch, > etc. Are you and others who like Paul really behind these ideas? Are > you in favor of such policies? > > Personally I am not arguing against these polices, being some what > towards rational libertarianism on the political scale. I am not > advocating them, but I would be interested in some slices of what he > suggests. But his view are SO counter to what appear to be the > mainstream political thinking in this group, I am laughingly surprised > that those who support Dennis K on one hand, can clap for ron paul a > second later. >
Finally some common sense on this subject. This is precisely what I was trying to tell other_worldlyness.
