--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>

> 
> Not everyone is as fortunate as we have been Rory.
> 
> I did not get that "instruction". I just knew it was...and left.

Yes, that's what I mean about getting that instruction. Much of 
the "really good stuff" is on that level of knowing, I'm finding :-)


> > (By the way, I'm pretty sure Judy is a Dharmapala.)

> Maybe for codependent TB's she is,

You mean codependent as in "codependent arising illusion"? :-)

> but it's a samsaric pattern my  
> friend and not the activity of a bodhisatva, although alot of  
> bleeding heart liberals DO believe they are...

I see her quite differently, now that my own anger/hurt/blame around 
the TMO has been healed. Essentially in this bodymind of awareness, 
she's a Dharmapala of practically perfect diamond-mind!

>nonetheless she is  
> rather lovable in her own curmudgeonly way.

Lovable, yes. Curmudgeonly? I'd say "exacting" -- upholding the 
Dharma of Truth to a "T" -- *not* supporting the TMO "party-line" 
when it deviates from the Truth, but also *not* supporting a knee-
jerk/illogical attack on the TMO stemming from the hurt/anger/blame 
cycle mentioned above.

  
> I've suggested many. Like the one Rory and I are talking about: an  
> Indian yogin and an American yogini, both of the Saraswati lineage  
> that Swami Brahmananda Saraswati was from. Both lineage holders: 
yogi/ 
> ni's who have realized the vision of all the chakra petals and 
routes  
> to Unity....and most importantly know how to help all types of  
> students, of all dispositions and doshas, and the sadhanas that 
lead  
> to Unity uniquely for them. I think that's a beautiful thing, a 
rare  
> thing and an important thing.

And an *ideal* thing....Sounds as if *someone* may be putting 
*someone* up on another pedestal...? ;-) 

And again, I am *not* at all sure how relevant the chakra-petals are 
to actual Awakening. And yet again, the misUnderstanding of the Hrit-
padma is nothing to sneeze at! :-)
 
> Short of a sadhana chip implant, I don't know how much better it  
> could get. ;-)

But that's what we all *have*, as far as I can see! :-)



Reply via email to