--- In [email protected], "Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Loving what *IS* may be different than loving what is -
Yes, what appears to be the remnants of dualism. I'm finding as we
inquire into and integrate our self-righteously scripted reactions
around warmongers, liars, false gurus, misusers of power, etc. ("I'm
better than so-and-so!") we see that after all we have been indulging
in the false-intellect, and have only been projecting our own dramas
onto the Emptiful perfection, withholding our all-inclusive Love and
superimposing an illusory snake upon an innocent string, and here and
now find that what had appeared to be "sin" only IS IS, indescribable,
radiantly beautiful, a perfect reflection of the Self -- as it has
always been!
Again, we've often found Byron Katie ("Loving what IS") to be very
useful in helping the divisive mind to catch up with Us :-)
