--- In [email protected], "Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "Alex Stanley" > <j_alexander_stanley@> wrote: > > > > So, it basically boils down to one guru who isn't qualified to be a > > guru lashing out at another guru because he isn't qualified to be a > > guru. Indian spiritual politics... gotta love it! > > > > Are we about to step into nonsense here because if so it is going to > be very short lived from this side. > > Go ahead and list the basis for claim that Swami G is not a Guru if > you like, then maybe there will be a response. Keep in mind my comment > in an earlier post, if it is thought that a post coming from Swami G > will be of no value, most likely there is not going to be one. I > haven't seen it happen too often but I have seen it. > > You can see Swami G tell of her journey and how it is that she became > a Guru in one of the 13 youtube videos under the search of Guruswamig
Your guru comes off to me like any other common person who has their own opinions. In the video I saw of her, she seems like any regular woman who attended some metaphysical classes and offers her point of view. In my view, she appears to offer absolutely nothing in her own persona, of spiritual substance that is impressive or appealing. Maharishi, whether he has certain initiations or not, has a much greater energy presence than your guru. Guru Dev [Swami Brahmananda Saraswati] far surpasses them both. This is just my view. Further, I don't think one can rely merely on what badges the boy scout [or girl scout] has acquired or claims, but rather on his character and the quality of the work he accomplishes. > Tanmay >
