--- In [email protected], "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Either way, translating it as "New Secular Order" is about as logical > as translating the cognate French phrase "fin de siecle" as "end of > the secular," instead of "end of the century," and writing a Dan > Brown novel about the secret fundamentalist sexist murdering land- > grabbing French conspiracy to restore monasticism at the close of the > 19th century, right after transmuting the moon into green cheese. > Hey, why not?
Its all good. Since Dan Brown and Off_World are [not yet whole, blissful and perfected in knowledge] parts of Rory. I mean parts of (well -- whole parts (sic), or whole reflections of) the infinite, boundless, pure potentiality and robust knowledge of Existence and Bliss (not the stupid kind -- a la Peter) Anything's possible, right? If we write a bad novel > asserting it, I'm sure we can pick up a few credulous believers!) [infinite, unbounded] Rory [quite a scary thought :)], I mean "We", can pick up a few more parts of Rory, in the POV of a few other parts of Rory, sorry, I mean Ourselves. The Wholenesses are cascading into WHOLNESSES. Its ALL ME! And the completion of the Tradition is ME. So who needs ME? Or me? Certainly not me. Well its a paradox! Lets thrive on it! D*D*D (happily and unabashedly Darkness, Dankness and Dumbness :)) (in playfulness) :)
