--- In [email protected], new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Do you mean that he sucked some into totally identifying with the TMO > (and many part way), and then made the TMO so weird that sanity can > only be maintained by "transcending" or total detachment from the > outer false "identities" with the TMO? > > Or do you mean that we transcend the worldly boundaries of the TMO, > and see it as part of Rory, I mean Ourselves, and thus we take > ownership in the a fact that we are that snake of weirdness -- that is > actually we are the rope of bliss? > > Or do you mean that MMY is a self-referral part of Ourselves, the act > of making weirdness is a part of Ourselves, the weirdness itself is > part of Ourdelves, and our renunciation of the wieirdness is part of > Ourselves? > > or do you mean: DOH! > Yep!:-)
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Poverty is imaginary -- the individual i... new . morning
- Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Poverty is imaginary -- the ind... Sal Sunshine
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Poverty is imaginary -- the ind... new . morning
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Poverty is imaginary -- the individ... jim_flanegin
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Poverty is imaginary -- the individ... jim_flanegin
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Poverty is imaginary -- the individ... nablusoss1008
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Poverty is imaginary -- the individ... nablusoss1008
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Poverty is imaginary -- the ind... John
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Poverty is imaginary -- the... boo_lives
- RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Poverty is imaginar... Rick Archer
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Poverty is imaginary --... John
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Poverty is imagina... TurquoiseB
- [FairfieldLife] Re: Poverty is ima... jim_flanegin
