--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 
> On Jun 19, 2007, at 1:19 PM, authfriend wrote:
> 
> > --- In [email protected], Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Jun 19, 2007, at 12:46 PM, authfriend wrote:
> > >
> > > > > go into it at will and often chose the duration. This makes 
it
> > > > > easier to measure. Being "insensible" to surroundings is 
easy to
> > > > > measure. While the subject is in samadhi, you plunge the arm
> > into
> > > > > ice cold water and look for a response to physiological
> > > > > measurements. Testing the startle reflex is another 
relatively
> > > > > simple test.
> > > >
> > > > That's a test for your (and Das and Gastaut's)
> > > > definition of samadhi.
> > > >
> > > > And it isn't even an EEG test. Ooops!
> > >
> > > Actually their research was the first to discover the direct
> > > correlation between samadhi and high-amplitude gamma waves...
> >
> > Between their definition of samadhi (they refer
> > to it as a state of "mental concentration") and
> > gamma waves, you mean.
> 
> Actually they used a number of descriptions.

Non sequitur, as you know.

> > Vaj, you've made some high-sounding claims that
> > you haven't even begun to document.
> 
> It was not nor is it my intent to write a paper documenting their  
> findings.

Nor did I suggest it was, or that you should
do so.  Non sequitur.

Here are the claims I was referring to (as you
know):

"Mahesh holds incorrect views in regards to stages of
meditation as described in the YS of Patanjali."

"Actually ["modern science"] has [had an EEG
definition of "legitimate" samadhi] since at least
the 1950's. Interestingly this [definition of samadhi]
is the same as traditional definitions and science has
been able to verify the claims."

> What is interesting in this case, is the lack of evidence  
> for samadhi in TM

According to Vaj's definition of samadhi.




, not the presence of it in forms of truly deep  
> meditation. Even more interesting to me is the recent studies on 
this  
> same phenomenon from a totally different style of meditation.
>


Reply via email to