--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > On Jun 19, 2007, at 12:46 PM, authfriend wrote:
> > 
> > > > go into it at will and often chose the duration. This makes it
> > > > easier to measure. Being "insensible" to surroundings is easy to
> > > > measure. While the subject is in samadhi, you plunge the arm 
> into
> > > > ice cold water and look for a response to physiological
> > > > measurements. Testing the startle reflex is another relatively
> > > > simple test.
> > >
> > > That's a test for your (and Das and Gastaut's)
> > > definition of samadhi.
> > >
> > > And it isn't even an EEG test. Ooops!
> > 
> > Actually their research was the first to discover the direct  
> > correlation between samadhi and high-amplitude gamma waves...
> 
> Between their definition of samadhi (they refer
> to it as a state of "mental concentration") and
> gamma waves, you mean.
> 
> Vaj, you've made some high-sounding claims that
> you haven't even begun to document.


But Judy, give him some slack. This is clearly the FIRST such lapse. :)




Reply via email to