--- In [email protected], "Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip>
> Now, back to this response- I choose to leave it as it is- my Guru,
> Swami G, is aware of the connection of the mind and Realization, and
> speaking from this platform, as she claims, has made that comment. 
> You may want to check what Ramana, considered one of the great 
> one;s has to say about the relationship of mind with One in 
> Realization.
> 
> What the Guru says is one thing, the rest of the story is living 
> what they said within one's own existence- this trims the gap 
> between what they say is the goal and what one knows from their
> own consciousness as a result of the connection and alignment to 
> the Guru and the path

No, this is all still non sequitur in context.
Apparently you didn't read the context of Peter's
comment either.

> --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "Ron" <sidha7001@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I asked G to comment:
> > > 
> > > Dr peter: 
> > > Perhaps MMY is speaking about a condition of mind and
> > >  not pure consciousness. 
> > > 
> > > G there is No conditioned mind in Pure Consciousness. If that
> > > were the case then there is simply an intellectual knowledge
> > > being paraded as Pure Consciousness. 
> > 
> > Complete non sequitur. She has no idea what Peter
> > is talking about. Did you not give her the context?
> > If you did, she obviously didn't bother to read it.


Reply via email to