On Jun 27, 2007, at 10:47 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
I see. The only possible reason that someone
could read something and interpret it differently
than you do is that they haven't read the context.
Or, that they've read it "incorrectly."
Or, that they have read it but they're "wrong,"
whereas you're "right."
Or, that they *know* that they are "wrong" but
are intentionally lying because they have
malevolent intent towards Maharishi, TM, the
TMO, or towards you personally.
Have I covered all the bases of the ways in
which you tend to respond to posts you don't
agree with?
This would make a good start for an FAQ.
I'm sure there are others, but that pretty much covers our wind-up
doll's typical answers.
Another fav is deconstructing sentence structure to mean something
other than the writers intention or contextually different comments
from old posts or simply deliberately misconstruing context. When
that doesn't work there's always arguing from ignorance.
