--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ron" <sidha7001@> wrote: > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > Now, back to this response- I choose to leave it as it is- my > > > > > > Guru, Swami G, is aware of the connection of the mind and > > > > > > Realization, and speaking from this platform, as she claims, > > has > > > > > > made that comment. You may want to check what Ramana, > > considered > > > > > > one of the great one;s has to say about the relationship of > > mind > > > > > > with One in Realization. > > > > > > > > > > > > What the Guru says is one thing, the rest of the story is > > living > > > > > > what they said within one's own existence- this trims the gap > > > > > > between what they say is the goal and what one knows from > > their > > > > > > own consciousness as a result of the connection and alignment > > to > > > > > > the Guru and the path > > > > > > > > > > No, this is all still non sequitur in context. > > > > > Apparently you didn't read the context of Peter's > > > > > comment either. > > > > > > > > Just to clarify: > > > > > > > > I got a real chuckle from your recommendation > > > > that I read Ramana to verify Swami G's comment, > > > > as if I were disputing what she said. "Non > > > > sequitur" doesn't mean "wrong," it means "This > > > > does not follow." It didn't have anything to > > > > do with what Peter said. > > > > > > > > It looks to me as though what happened was that > > > > Swami G glanced at Peter's comment without reading > > > > the context, saw an opportunity to put MMY down, > > > > and, of course, took it. > > > > > > And trust us, Ron, this is the first time > > > Judy has ever felt this way. > > > > Translation: Barry hasn't read the context either. > > I see. The only possible reason that someone > could read something and interpret it differently > than you do is that they haven't read the context.
Um, no. Non sequitur.
