Was it Vaj recently who commented on Judy's tendency to obfuscate? And Judy who denied she does it? And was it Curtis who commented on her tendency to glom onto some unimportant word or phrase and argue about it endlessly in an attempt to derail the real sub- stance of the discussion? I think she denied that as well.
For Judy, the only important thing in this thread is how high the fences are. :-) --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > <snip> > > Others may read the story and see no parallels > > whatsoever to spiritual communities that seem > > to close themselves off from the world. I do. > > Call me an old populist, but in my book building > > fences between yourself and the world -- no matter > > what the supposedly laudable reasons for doing > > so may be -- is still building fences between > > yourself and the world. > > Ooh, Barry still doesn't get it. As both I and > Alex have pointed out, the SUV fences are > obviously not designed to close the world out. > > In fact, the fences around most non-SUV homes > are more protective than these are; they usually > have a gate at the front (and are frequently > higher and less easily penetrated). > > Fences around homes generally are very common > in the West. They're by no means unique to SUV > or even to spiritual communities. > > You may not like fences on general principles, > and that's OK, but it's really, *really* silly > to make believe your distaste has any special > relevance to SUV/spiritual communities.
