--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Have you also noticed that none of these folks who > are rushing to "pile on" has ever mentioned the > thing that they're really angry about?
I wasn't rushing to "pile on;" I was pointing out that -- contrary to Judy's view -- IMO the critics *aren't* being intentionally dishonest. We're all doing the best we can with our ingrained blind- spots. > They're pursuing Judy's distraction because the real > topic that's pushed their buttons is SV "prosperity > fences" and the belief that building one can make > you prosperous. > No one wants to get into that. If they did they'd > have to come up with reasons *why* they believe that > fences around an arbitrary property line generate > beneficial woo woo rays. And I think we all know that > the answer to that question is, "Because Maharishi > said so." So they attack instead. God, Turq, I hope you don't really believe this. I couldn't care less one way or the other about prosperity fences or what MMY says about them. As I pointed out earlier, I just bought a house in FF with a SOUTH DOOR. The horror! :-) > Is there anyone out there who *does* believe in the > efficacy of SV fences who has the balls to speak up > and say *why* you believe that? Even if it's just, > "Maharishi sez." On the other hand, if someone with such a fence *does* believe deeply in their properties, I suspect they will warp their reality fields in such a way as to manifest a fulfillment of their beliefs, as we all do with one thing or another :-) > That's a good reason, if you believe that what > Maharishi sez is true. In my book, saying that is > cool...you can believe whatever you want. But when > you have to resort to ad hominem *rather* than saying > that you believe that things are true because Maharishi > said they are true, I think that conveys a different > message than the one you think you're sending. Why does everyone think it's such a big deal that we have blind- spots?
