--- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > do.rflex:
> > > 
> > > Whatever you have reproduced here does NOT back up your claim 
> that 
> > > Bush "over and over and over again" tried to tie Saddam to 9/11.
> > > 
> > > Show us evidence of THAT instead of distracting us with pap.
> > 
> > 
> > My God, man, those are direct quotes from Bush during the lead up to
> > the Iraq war! Are you blind?!? Or are you purposely being obtuse?
> 
> 
> Okay, Sweetheart, let's take a look at them (see comments below 
> following each quote)

[snip]

> > > > 
> > > > Well, let's have a look:
> > > > 
> > > >         
> > > > Edited on Sun Aug-27-06 12:21 PM by EarlG
> > > > Bush knew no Iraq link pre-9/11: report
> > > > 
> > > > US President George W Bush was informed 10 days after the 
> September
> > > > 11, 2001 attacks that US intelligence had no proof of links 
> between
> > > > Iraq and this act of terror, The National Journal reported 
> today.
> > > > 
> > > > Citing government documents as well as past and present Bush
> > > > administration officials, the magazine said the president was 
> > > briefed
> > > > on September 21, 2001 that evidence of cooperation between Iraq 
> and
> > > > the al-Qaeda terrorist network was insufficient.
> > > > 
> > > > Bush was also informed that there was some credible information 
> > > about
> > > > contacts between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda that showed that 
> the
> > > > Iraqi dictator had tried to establish surveillance over the 
> group,
> > > > according to the report.
> > > > 
> > > > Saddam Hussein believed the radical Islamic network represented 
> a
> > > > threat for his secular regime...
> > > > 
> > > > http://smh.com.au/news/world/bush-knew-no-iraq-link-pre...
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > George W. Bush
> > > > 
> > > > 2002
> > > > 
> > > > "The regime has longstanding and continuing ties to terrorist 
> > > groups,
> > > > and there are Al Qaida terrorists inside Iraq." - George W. Bush
> > > > Delivers Weekly Radio Address, White House (9/28/2002) - 
> > > BushOnIraq.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> He said as a separate part of the first sentence that there were Al 
> Qaida terrorist inside Iraq.  Where is he tying them to Saddam?  
> Iraq's a big country and during Saddam's time had many factions in 
> many parts of the country that Saddam didn't control.
> 
> No tying here.


Tying is clearly implied.


> > > > "We know that Iraq and al Qaeda have had high-level contacts 
> that go
> > > > back a decade. Some al Qaeda leaders who fled Afghanistan went 
> to
> > > > Iraq. These include one very senior al Qaeda leader who received
> > > > medical treatment in Baghdad this year, and who has been 
> associated
> > > > with planning for chemical and biological attacks. We've 
> learned 
> > > that
> > > > Iraq has trained al Qaeda members in bomb-making and poisons and
> > > > deadly gases." - President Bush Outlines Iraqi Threat; Remarks 
> by 
> > > the
> > > > President on Iraq, White House (10/7/2002) - Whitehouse.gov
> 
> 
> 
> 
> So?  Is this not true?


It's not true.


> 
> You do know, don't you, that Saddam killed thousands with poison gas?


Yeah. And he got the gas warfare components from the USA.


> > > > "I think they're both equally important, and they're both 
> dangerous.
> > > > And as I said in my speech in Cincinnati, we will fight if need 
> be 
> > > the
> > > > war on terror on two fronts. We've got plenty of capacity to do 
> so.
> > > > And I also mentioned the fact that there is a connection 
> between al
> > > > Qaeda and Saddam Hussein. The war on terror, Iraq is a part on 
> the 
> > > war
> > > > on terror. And he must disarm." - President Condems Attack in 
> Bali,
> > > > White House (10/14/2002) - Whitehouse.gov
> 
> 
> 
> 
> "...a connection".  Ooh, Bush is REALLY going out on a limb and tying 
Al Qaida to Saddam there.


Bush falsely claimed a connection.



> > > > "This is a man who has got connections with Al Qaida. Imagine a
> > > > terrorist network with Iraq as an arsenal and as a training 
> ground, 
> > > so
> > > > that a Saddam Hussein could use this shadowy group of people to 
> > > attack
> > > > his enemy and leave no fingerprint behind. He's a threat." - 
> Remarks
> > > > by the President in Texas Welcome, White House (11/4/2002) -
> > > > Whitehouse.gov
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> No tying there.


Read the first sentence again, Bozo.


> > > > "He's a threat because he is dealing with Al Qaida. In my 
> Cincinnati
> > > > speech I reminded the American people, a true threat facing our
> > > > country is that an Al Qaida-type network trained and armed by 
> Saddam
> > > > could attack America and leave not one fingerprint." - President
> > > > Outlines Priorities, White House (11/7/2002) - BushOnIraq.gov
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Hypothetically speaking.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > > > 
> > > > "He's had contacts with Al Qaida. Imagine the scenario where an 
> Al
> > > > Qaida-type organization uses Iraq as an arsenal, a place to get
> > > > weapons, a place to be trained to use the weapons. Saddam 
> Hussein
> > > > could use surrogates to come and attack people he hates." - 
> Remarks 
> > > by
> > > > the President at Arkansas Welcome, White House (11/4/2002) -
> > > > BushOnIraq.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> You're repeating the same quote here from the same day.  That's not 
> what I would call showing me where Bush claimed it "over and over and 
> over again".
> 
> Nice try.


An error from the website. There *many more* Bush AND Cheney
statements below.


> > > > 2003
> > > > 
> > > > "Evidence from intelligence sources, secret communications, and
> > > > statements by people now in custody reveal that Saddam Hussein 
> aids
> > > > and protects terrorists, including members of al Qaeda. 
> Secretly, 
> > > and
> > > > without fingerprints, he could provide one of his hidden 
> weapons to
> > > > terrorists, or help develop their own." - President 
> Delivers "State 
> > > of
> > > > the Union", White House (1/28/2003) - Whitehouse.gov
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> "including members of Al Qaida".  Said as an afterthought.
> 
> Not a ringing endorsement.
> 
> Of course, it turned out to be true so, if anything, Bush didn't hype 
> the connection enough!


No. It was false.



> > > > "Before September the 11th, many in the world believed that 
> Saddam
> > > > Hussein could be contained. But chemical agents, lethal 
> viruses, and
> > > > shadowy terrorist networks are not easily contained. Imagine 
> those 
> > > 19
> > > > hijackers with other weapons and other planes -- this time 
> armed by
> > > > Saddam Hussein. It would take one vial, one canister, one crate
> > > > slipped into this country to bring a day of horror like none we 
> have
> > > > ever known." - President Delivers "State of the Union", White 
> House
> > > > (1/28/2003) - Whitehouse.gov
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Again, he uses the word "imagine". No tying Al Qaida to Saddam...he's 
using a hypothetical.


Your being obtuse. 


> > > > "Saddam Hussein has longstanding, direct and continuing ties to
> > > > terrorist networks. Senior members of Iraqi intelligence and al 
> > > Qaeda
> > > > have met at least eight times since the early 1990s. Iraq has 
> sent
> > > > bomb-making and document forgery experts to work with al Qaeda. 
> Iraq
> > > > has also provided al Qaeda with chemical and biological weapons
> > > > training. We also know that Iraq is harboring a terrorist 
> network,
> > > > headed by a senior al Qaeda terrorist planner." - President 
> Bush:
> > > > "World Can Rise to This Moment", White House (2/6/2003) - 
> > > Whitehouse.gov
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Oooh.  Eight times.
> 
> By the way, is it true?


No, it isn't true.

 
> I'm stopping here because I see below you're repeating again.


You can't credibly deny that Bush & Cheney publicly pushed the idea
and claimed a connection between Saddam and Al Qaeda.

[snipped further massive evidence that BushCo publicly made false
statements that connected Saddam to Al Qaeda and therefore 9/11] 







Reply via email to