--- In [email protected], "BillyG." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > If you're aware *of* bliss as a "something," as > > blissfulness, that isn't no thoughts/no mantra, > > by definition. > > I think I see the problem now, you must remember that MMY's > description of Samadhi includes *three* adjectives, it's Absolute > (Sat, eternal without a second), Chit (Consciousness) and Ananda > (Bliss, not *blissful* in the animated sense).
Yes, BillyG, I know that. It's not a "problem." It doesn't change anything I said. And I can't imagine where you got the notion that I had claimed consciousness "stops" in TC-by-itself. That would be a contradiction in terms.
