--re: "There's only THAT". Of course! That's pretty obvious, but THAT's not the whole story since THAT includes everything relative AS THAT. Thus, Sutphen's Neo-Advaita is false; MMY's worldview is true.
- In [email protected], Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- "BillyG." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" > > <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > But the answer to the question "What is samadhi > > > like?" is still "It's like nothing." > > > > As long as you define *nothing* as no *thing*, that > > is, no relative > > thing I can agree with you. Anandam, however is > > poorly referred to as > > *nothing*, (and is not relative) as it brings to > > mind a state of > > emptiness which is clearly NOT the case. The little > > me becomes the > > big ME and experiences itself as pure > > bliss......then when you come > > out of TC you carry some of it with you each time > > until you're never > > out of it. Cool! > > You're talking about sattvic states of mind. The > little me does not become the Big me. That is only a > useful fiction that MMY spoke about. The little me > disappears and there is no me only THAT. > > > > > > > > > > > > > To subscribe, send a message to: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Or go to: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ > > and click 'Join This Group!' > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ ______________ > TV dinner still cooling? > Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV. > http://tv.yahoo.com/ >
