--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> 
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I had no interest in your "spiritual experiences,"
> > > > dearie. I was just wondering how far you'd go with
> > > > this pretense of long weekends away from the com-
> > > > puter. This one wasn't much longer than a usual 
> > > > weekend, because you posted to the TM-Free blog 
> > > > Friday afternoon, and here you are back on Sunday 
> > > > afternoon, still in the same old mindstate.
> > > . . .
> > > And he was having orgasms at the thought that he
> > > was going to catch me lying about how long I was
> > > away. But then, when I fouled up his plans by
> > > telling the truth--that I hadn't been away for 72
> > > hours--in response to his lie, he lied *again*,
> > > about when I had posted on TMFree, in an attempt
> > > to recoup *something* from his failed ploy.
> > 
> > Now *that* is curious. I understand that Judy
> > is pissed off that her pretense of spending
> > weekends away from the computer is blown.
> 
> Can't "blow" a nonexistent pretense, sorry. You've
> fantasized a pretense on my part (jealous of my
> long weekends, apparently), and you *thought* you
> were going to blow that fantasized pretense by
> asking me to confirm a length of time away that
> you knew wasn't accurate.
> 
> Then you were going to point to the TMFree posts
> as "proof" that I was lying.  But you failed,
> because I *don't* lie, and you exposed yourself
> once again as being fanatically--even maniacally--
> obsessed with me and my posting habits.
> 
> Again, Barry, you AREN'T GOING TO KNOW when I
> leave and when I return. And if you don't stop
> trying to puzzle it out, you're going to go 
> round the bend. You're almost there already.
> 
>  But
> > *why* on earth would she accuse *me* of lying 
> > about something that is right there on the 
> > TM-Free website, and so easily verifiable by 
> > anyone here?
> 
> It sure is verifiable, but unfortunately it
> doesn't verify Barry's lie.
> 
>  I noticed her comments today when 
> > browsing the site for the first time in a long 
> > while. (Hint: it's still boring.)
> > 
> > She made two comments to TM-Free on Friday, 
> > one to the thread about "Witnessing Sleep" at 
> > 8:53 pm my time, which is 1:53pm her time if 
> > I'm not mistaken. And she made another comment 
> > to the "Obama in Fairfield" thread at 9:23pm 
> > my time, 2:23pm her time.
> 
> You're "mistaken," both times. 
>  
> > Last I checked, both comments were made on 
> > "Friday afternoon," just as I said.
> 
> Nope, Friday night, my time.

It's getting hard to tell who's stalking whom.


Reply via email to