--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
<snip>
> > I'm chuckling, remembering when you suggested the
> > Byron Katie approach to me some time back, and I
> > rejected it on similar grounds to what Barry's
> > putting forth here.
> > 
> > He proceeded to try to kick me in the nuts for
> > purportedly spinning rationalizations on why not to
> > try it. (You refrained from doing so, apparently
> > because I didn't seem to you to be metaphorically
> > on crack waving a pistol around.)
> 
> Thank you for settling, at long last, the question
> of whether you *have* nuts.  :-)

Barry, my nuts have always been your fantasy.

> Thank you also for settling the question of how 
> long you can go after one of your long, relaxing
> weekends away without falling back in to the "Gotta
> trash Barry" routine.  :-)

Exactly as long as you don't provide me with targets.

> But just for fun, is this the post that you char-
> acterize as "trying to kick you in the nuts?" If
> so, I guess I'm trying again. What I thought your 
> motivations were with regard to realization then 
> are exactly what I think of them today. And there 
> is no more of an attempt to "kick you in the nuts" 
> in my reposting them than there was in posting them 
> in the first place.

And no less of one, either.

 The purpose *of* posting them 
> is to show you the stories you tell yourself about 
> the past, and the way that you tend to remember -- 
> or misremember -- that past. No stories, no pain. 
> True stories, no pain. Imagined stories, seemingly 
> a great *deal* of pain, equivalent in your mind to 
> being kicked in the nuts.

Not. You missed the word "try." And this story
wasn't imagined, either; thanks for confirming with
your repost.

Rory and I had a terrific discussion, and others
chimed in with wonderful insights. Barry, almost
needless to say, missed the point completely; he
was, as usual, more intent on putting me down than
actually following what Rory and I were talking
about, let alone dealing with it.  As I said at
the time, he was distinctly hors de combat in
that exchange.

My response to the post of Barry's he goes on to
quote is in message #64354, if anyone is interested.

It's still hugely amusing to see Barry now taking
*my* side and trying to kick *Rory* in the nuts.
(I have no doubt that Rory's nuts, quite unlike
mine, are not just a figment of Barry's imagination,
but even so he fails to land his kick.)


Reply via email to