--- In [email protected], Michael Dean Goodman 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Janet Luise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I remember someone telling about that visit when Muktananda & Co 
were
> > at Seelisberg  probably Chotti  (Charlotte Uhlenbusch Roeder but 
maybe
> > some other German lady)
> > – that there were lots of similarities between groups
> > Western followers — both groups consuming huge amounts of sweets 
etc
> > That MMY made lots of points with Muktanadas followers by having 
MUk
> > sit HIGHER than MMY because he was a Brahmin.
> > Muktanada's followers were chanting the Guru Gita & at some point
> > Muktananda himself left while they continued chanting.
> > 
> > MMY commented (& I don't know if this was while the other group 
was
> > there or afterward)  that did people notice the quality of their
> > chanting was different when Muktananda was present?  That 
Muktananda
> > was taking their karma as they chanted ....
> > so that sounds like the Aussie story.
> > 
> > I actually wonder how they happened to BE in Seelisberg.  Thanks 
for
> > the story!
> 
> 
>  >> Rick Archer wrote:
> 
> >> I spent the summer of '76 in New Jersey with John Gray, Billy 
Clayton, 
>  >> and two other guys. Maharishi sent us there to "inspire the 
local
>  >> teachers" during the NJ court case. John and Billy visited 
Muktananda
>  >> a lot that summer and invited him to visit MMY in Seelisberg. 
Reportedly,
>  >> MMY was pissed that they did that on his behalf without 
consulting him,
>  >> but when Muktananda and his entourage showed up, MMY made the 
best of it.
> > 
> >> After Muktananda left, MMY met with the folks in Seelisberg and 
reportedly 
>  >> asked them some questions that implied he was concerned that 
their devo-
>  >> tion to him might have been swayed by their exposure to another 
saint. I
>  >> wasn't there and can't relate anything more extensive than 
that, although
>  >> I later saw a videotape of MMY's meeting with Muktananda.
> 
> 
> Dear Fairfield Lifers,
> 
> I was there at this famous meeting in 1976 between Maharishi and 
Swami
> Muktananda.  Parts of the information in the 2 e-mails above seems 
in-
> accurate; here's what I remember:
> 
> Swami Muktananda was traveling on tour throughout Europe with a 
large
> entourage of his followers.  A meeting was arranged with Maharishi 
in
> the big meeting room in Seelisberg where Maharishi held evening 
know-
> ledge meetings for the international staff - in the beautiful gold
> meeting hall that you see in many videos.
> 
> Muktananda and his entourage were the guests of honor that evening,
> and the meeting was, in essence, turned over to them as I remember.
> Maharishi was seated on the stage on the central couch, as usual.
> Swami Muktananda was seated on another couch to Maharishi's right
> (a place of great honor - the teacher often is on the right when
> he sits with a student, as in a TM initiation).  Neither was higher
> or lower than the other.  (Muktananda seemed quite happy with the
> seating arrangement, and didn't express verbally or physically any
> desire to change it - till the end - but we're getting ahead of
> the story!)
> 
> The audience was the entire international staff, 108's, faculty,
> VIPs, etc. - plus the participants on my course (a year-long, ex-
> perimental course where Maharishi was giving us a lot of personal
> attention).  He specifically invited our course to this special
> meeting - sent a bus all the way around Lake Lucerne and had us
> travel over an hour to get there, which messed up our routine and
> only happened on very special occasions (celebrations, special an-
> nouncements, guests, etc.).  So Maharishi knew that something spe-
> cial was up - Swami Muktananda did not arrive as any kind of sur-
> prise.
> 
> That evening, to begin the meeting, Maharishi said some brief, but
> very uplifting and honoring remarks about Swami Muktananda.  Maha-
> rishi then asked Swami Muktananda to speak, which he did, through
> his interpreter (a young woman), and during that talk he spoke
> highly of Maharishi.  He also spoke quite forcefully about the ig-
> norance and superficiality of Western science when compared with
> deep, vedic knowledge.
> 
> After he spoke, Swami Muktananda and his followers chanted the Guru
> Gita (which is a part of the Skanda Purana, and contains some sig-
> nificant components of the TM puja ceremony).
> 
> During all of this, all throughout his talking or chanting, Swami
> Muktananda did what he does with his students - had them come sit
> right near him for a minute or two, and then sent them back to
> their seat in the audience and replaced them with another of his
> students, apparently giving them powerful darshan.
> 
> Basically, Maharishi turned over the program for the evening to
> Swami Muktananda, and sat quietly, often with eyes closed, after
> his own opening words.  He didn't interact on the surface (make
> remarks, do commentary, exchange looks, etc.).  He seemed very
> deep within.
> 
> To me, and a number of my friends on my course, it seemed like a
> kind of friendly, cosmic "contest" was developing: which of these
> two powerful saints was going to "make the other move".  It was
> obvious, almost palpable, that there was a great flow of love,
> respect, and especially cosmic power, between these two.
> 
> And the contrast was very clear - Swami Muktananda manifesting
> his power through activity (forceful speech, moving his disciples
> about, group chanting, animated gestures) and Maharishi manifest-
> ing his power through silence and non-movement.  Almost like the
> polarity of Goddess Shakti and Lord Shiva, the two great polar
> opposite fields of life.
> 
> The polarity of this silence and activity was intense.  Obviously,
> something had to give.  And, at a certain moment late in the even-
> ing, right in the middle of saying something to or about Maharishi,
> Swami Muktananda abruptly stopped talking, quickly got up, sat down
> right next to Maharishi on his couch, and hugged him in a big bear-
> hug.  Everyone, the followers of both Masters, were shocked and
> amazed, and the room became VERY agitated!  Suddenly, people were
> up out of their seats, moving about, taking pictures of the two
> Masters, talking, etc.  The silence, the chanting, etc. were obvi-
> ously over.  To the best of my knowledge, no guest had ever sat down
> next to Maharishi on his couch, nor snuggled up against him, nor
> wrapped him in a hug!
> 
> Maharishi didn't seem upset, and didn't look any more uncomfortable
> than you'd be if you'd been deep in silence and somebody bounced
> down onto the couch next to you and grabbed you.  Maharishi didn't
> appear to try and pull away or get up.  The two of them exchanged a
> few private words in the midst of this chaos, then both arose and
> exited the meeting hall together, leaving the room in turmoil.
> 
> Some of Muktananda's followers, in their enthusiasm, and stirred up
> by the excited energy of what had just happened, not aware of the
> normal etiquette, rushed for the door to follow their Master, liter-
> ally climbing over chairs.  The men from my course waited a few min-
> utes for the chaos to settle down and the exits to clear, and then
> we eventually got back on our bus and rode an hour back to our quiet
> hotel on the other side of the lake where we spent our days deep in
> meditation.
> 
> The consensus among us was that we'd just seem something cosmic and
> powerful.  Some incredible tension (not of a negative nature) had
> been generated, and eventually burst into that final action by Swami
> Muktananda.
> 
> When Maharishi came to visit with us the next day on our course, we
> asked him about what we'd seen.  We said that it had looked like
> the meeting of an immovable object with an irresistible force, or
> something like that.  Maharishi confirmed that.  He said that it
> was a matter of which one of them was going to move to the other,
> and that we had seen activity magnetized to pounce on silence.
> 
> He implied that silence was always the most irresistible, and with
> a twinkle in his eye he said that Swami Muktananda had ultimately
> succumbed to that irresistibility.  There was the implication that
> something deep, something invincible, had been revealed to us in
> that exchange between these two great souls, something about the
> power of silent Being, and that's what he had invited us there to
> witness.
> 
> Never having seen Maharishi touched, especially so enthusiastical-
> ly and explosively, we asked him something naive like "Wasn't it
> strange to have someone touching you like that - how do you main-
> tain your purity?"  [In retrospect our question was kind of silly,
> and reflective of our own spiritual misunderstanding, since Maha-
> rishi was not reclusive or disconnected from the world - quite the
> opposite, he was so dynamically involved in the world of activity
> in those days - much more than most of us ever will be.]  Maharishi
> replied: "I just stayed on my Self", which seemed to answer more
> than we had asked.
> 
> Namaste,
> 
> Michael
> 
> Michael Dean Goodman, Ph.D.
> The PremYoga Center, Co-Director
> PARA - The Center for Realization, Director
> The Relationship Institute, Director
> International Governor, World Government of the Age of Enlightenment
> Boca Raton (Palm Beach County) Florida
> 561-350-3930 * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Dedicated to removing the constrictions to the full flow of life -
> whether they be physical, mental/emotional, or spiritual - and to
> the unfoldment of peace, freedom, awareness, love, and ecstasy
> 
> Spiritual guide (ashtanga yoga/meditation, tantra, vedanta, ayur 
veda)
> Counselor * Life Coach * Speaker/Educator * Author
> Private Sessions * Classes * Workshops & Retreats * Satsangs (Self-
inquiry)
> Clients and programs throughout the United States, Europe, and India
> Working in person or by phone
> Free initial consultation to discuss your needs and goals

Dear Michael

I've heard and read this store many times before, the Muktanandagroup 
also published a pamphlet about this meeting, and the story has been 
told me from people who also was present.
But the details, depth and respect in what you just wrote surpasses 
anything I have heard before. 

Thank you very much for sharing this with us !



Reply via email to