--- In [email protected], "BillyG." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote:
> >
> > I had a number of heated debates with Charlie devotees. Most of them
> didn't
> > seem to care whether or not Charlie was representing Maharishi's
> teachings.
> > They considered Charlie to be a member of the White Brotherhood and
> in an
> > exalted state of consciousness with direct cognitive or intuitive
> access to
> > the things he was saying. I think Charlie tried to give them this
> > impression. I always argued that he was merely parroting things he
> had read
> > in esoteric books, but they didn't buy it. I remember one guy
> arguing that
> > Charlie was undoubtedly enlightened "because he had been meditating 15
> > years."
> 
> I think your comment has some merit, vis-a-vis how 'others' saw
> Charlie, I've met a few myself, but that's them, not him. Charlie was
> not a perfect being..he had flaws, so who doesn't?  He was MMY's
> biggest Champion, IMO.


Indeed.



Reply via email to