"I have no intention of meeting Curtis at
"Union station", now or at any time in the future for
sexual activities)"

Thanks for crushing my dream man, crushing my dream.

BTW anytime you need a non-professional to call somebody here "nutz",
just tap 3 times on the side of the stall.  (Twice if you run out of
TP and once if you have changed your mind about the toilet stall romance.)




--- In [email protected], Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 
> --- curtisdeltablues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> 
> > You can take the peter out of the doctor, but you
> > can't take the
> > doctor out of Peter?
> > 
> > I've been watching this thread with some interest. 
> > My first reaction
> > was to defend Peter, so I took a little more time to
> > see if I could
> > get around my personal bias of friendship. (We are
> > not exactly tapping
> > our feet in adjacent stalls but I dig the guy)
> > 
> > I don't think that posting on this board is a venue
> > for him to act as
> > a doctor, posting here makes you a poster on a
> > fairly outrageous
> > board.  I don't even know exactly what his
> > credentials are.  If I
> > don't know you personally I don't take it at face
> > value what anyone's
> > claimed credentials are here. When Peter posts here
> > I don't view his
> > writing in the same way his patients view his
> > serious professional
> > opinion in the context of his actual role as doctor.
> >  You have to
> > accept this relationship with any doctor and even
> > then don't have to
> > take his advise or opinions.  He is just the same
> > funny guy who I
> > shared entertaining lunches with decades ago.
> > 
> > Posting here is a place to unwind from professional
> > identities with
> > their serious consequences.  No one is always acting
> > in their
> > professional capacity and posting on boards like
> > this is not a way to
> > receive a medical diagnosis.  So I have not gotten
> > past my own
> > "pro-Peter) bias, but I am still defending Peter's
> > right to use this
> > board to say whatever he wants without the shaming
> > that he is not
> > being "professional".  None of us are as far as I
> > can tell, that's
> > what makes this a cool clubhouse.
> > 
> > Now if Richard takes the hint from what Peter said
> > and got a check-up
> > from the neck-up...that would not be the worst
> > outcome for everyone's
> > welfare as far as I am concerned.  I don't need to
> > be a weatherman to
> > know which way the wind is blowing...
> 
> Thank you Curtis...Union station...third stall on the
> right ...wear tassled loafers, tiger.
> 
> -Peter (this post is not posted in any professional
> capacity. It is also a parody in light of recent
> events. I have no intention of meeting Curtis at
> "Union station", now or at any time in the future for
> sexual activities)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], new.morning
> > <no_reply@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], Vaj
> > <vajranatha@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > > On Aug 31, 2007, at 12:54 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > > But even if he WERE psychotic, it would
> > STILL be
> > > > > > unethical for Peter to deliver that
> > diagnosis
> > > > > > publically, and ESPECIALLY for the purpose
> > of venting
> > > > > > his frustration--because he's a credentialed
> > > > > > professional, and his word therefore carries
> > much
> > > > > > more weight than anything the rest of us
> > might say.
> > > > 
> > > > > I don't agree. I certainly didn't take Peter's
> > comment as a
> > diagnosis
> > > > > but a casual aside. You don't like Peter
> > because he is critical
> > of TM
> > > > > and so you jumped on him. That is your normal
> > MO around here.
> > > > 
> > > > Precisely. It is not a formal diagnosis anymore
> > than Barry 1.0's  
> > > > casual remarks on past events are historical
> > research.
> > > > 
> > > > For someone who claims to have a career in
> > editing, it's pretty  
> > > > strange when you can't distinguish one from the
> > other on a
> > consistent  
> > > > basis.
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  I am not sure i agree. To assert in one breath
> > that one has the right
> > > and sanction to declare one "crazy" in Florida --
> > (re)establishing
> > > their credentials, and in the next (a few days
> > later) to assert, on
> > > line, to a virtual stranger,  that based on some
> > posts that they are 
> > > i) crazy, and ii) and recommending powerful
> > psychotropic drugs, 
> > > seems a bit unprofessional, IMO. But what do I
> > know. Ask the Florida
> > > licensing board.
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > To subscribe, send a message to:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > Or go to: 
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
> > and click 'Join This Group!' 
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > 
> > 
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
>        
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> Building a website is a piece of cake. Yahoo! Small Business gives
you all the tools to get online.
> http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/webhosting
>


Reply via email to