--- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> > wrote: > <snip> Kind of like the whole paradigm of enlightenment; I don't > > > know how it works, but it just does.:-) > > > > > > I believe you're dead wrong on this, Jim. The people you mention > who > > may be living Brahman etc. > > There is no "may be" about it.:-) > > are doing it based on the TM techniques, > > NOT on "whatever he [Maharishi] is doing". You're conflating > > Maharishi's behavior with the techniques, and in the process you're > > complicit in accepting "whatever he is doing". > > One hundred percent! Jai Guru Dev!:-) > > > It's very disturbing to me to see so many TMers not only make > excuses > > for Maharishi's behavior and not notice or care about it, but > worse, > > implicitly promote the idea that spiritual integrity doesn't matter > > and isn't a part of the outcome of TM. > > > I don't know what else to say other than Brahman *is* spiritual > integrity, and Maharishi has, and many others have, attained Brahman > by following him.:-)
You're fooling yourself ...
