--- In [email protected], "do.rflex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@>
wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "do.rflex" <do.rflex@>
> > wrote:
> > <snip> Kind of like the whole paradigm of enlightenment; I don't
> > > > know how it works, but it just does.:-)
> > >
> > >
> > > I believe you're dead wrong on this, Jim. The people you
mention
> > who
> > > may be living Brahman etc.
> >
> > There is no "may be" about it.:-)
> >
> > are doing it based on the TM techniques,
> > > NOT on "whatever he [Maharishi] is doing". You're conflating
> > > Maharishi's behavior with the techniques, and in the process
you're
> > > complicit in accepting "whatever he is doing".
> >
> > One hundred percent! Jai Guru Dev!:-)
> >
> > > It's very disturbing to me to see so many TMers not only make
> > excuses
> > > for Maharishi's behavior and not notice or care about it, but
> > worse,
> > > implicitly promote the idea that spiritual integrity doesn't
matter
> > > and isn't a part of the outcome of TM.
> > >
> > I don't know what else to say other than Brahman *is* spiritual
> > integrity, and Maharishi has, and many others have, attained
Brahman
> > by following him.:-)
>
>
> You're fooling yourself ...
>
Exactly-- there is no bigger fool than myself.:-)
