jstein wrote:
> I'd ask Barry to provide examples to the contrary,
> but there wouldn't be any point.
>
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/143310

No, the above is what I actually wrote, citing Wilber,
and showing you to be a liar.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/143497

As you know, Willytex, what I was calling Barry's fantasy 
was *not* that Lenz had levitated. Liar that you are, you 
omitted the context to make it seem that I had.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/140399

Your team of profligate liars and racketeers lost 
in '06 and continues to lose. 

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/143504

Horseshit.

Classics from the alt.m.t. Groove Yard
http://tinyurl.com/74d95

>From Judy Stein to Willytex:

Liar.
No, liar.
Wrong, liar.
Bite me, toots.
Non sequitur, liar.
Yes, it does, liar.
Willytex is a liar.
No, she did not, liar.
Yeah, it's a non sequitur.
As usual, Willytex is the liar.
Outright, deliberate falsehood.
Bob Dole is a liar, just like you.
Another right-winger bent on deception.
You've been lying your head off for months.
And that's just an outright, deliberate falsehood.
You snipped the context to obscure that fact, liar.
Boy, do you need a course in the fundamentals of logic.
 
> His "opinion" about the general usage here of the
> term "liar" is also incorrect, in my observation.
> It's rare that someone is called a liar for merely
> expressing an opinion about someone else. If it
> does happen, it's likely to be because the person
> using the term knows that the person expressing
> the "opinion" has evidence that clearly documents
> the inaccuracy of that "opinion."

Reply via email to