On Oct 19, 3:41 am, Chris Kent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The things that really stand out for me are the bringing of all > maintenance into content types, the refactoring of the security model > and the enhancements to the plugins.
With the advent of formtools working with types is just so much fun. It's really frustrating when a section of the framework schema is not a type because everything has to be built separately. We're looking to bring as much of the underlying datamodel under the umbrella of types as possible. > But the one that really caught my eye is "ability to use formtools > without content type machinery" I was just looking for this feature or > how to get it to work a couple of days ago. This will be a very big > useful upgrade to the Farcry framework and can see this making the > development of application workflow possible using formtools. This is actually something we've bee cogitating on for a while with respect to sorting out things like config, login screens, and so on. Blair has come up with some clever ideas to make this happen. The first heavy lifting with non-persistent formtool gadgetry will be the replacement of configs. > p.s. any developments on the XStandard plug in - have not seen > anything in SVN Definitely have plans to make XStandard a first class citizen. -- geoff http://www.daemon.com.au/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "farcry-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
