very impressive indeed! Any thoughts about making workflow customisable? So for example, another step can be added to the approval process (legal) Or a rule like 3 out of 5 people need to agree before a change is approved
On 10/19/07, Chris Kent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Geoff, > > This looks like a very impressive list of items. > > The things that really stand out for me are the bringing of all > maintenance into content types, the refactoring of the security model > and the enhancements to the plugins. > > But the one that really caught my eye is "ability to use formtools > without content type machinery" I was just looking for this feature or > how to get it to work a couple of days ago. This will be a very big > useful upgrade to the Farcry framework and can see this making the > development of application workflow possible using formtools. > > p.s. any developments on the XStandard plug in - have not seen > anything in SVN > > Chris. > > > On Oct 17, 4:36 am, modius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > FarCry 4.1: Roadmap for Fortress > > ========================= > > The next release of FarCry Core is codenamed Fortress. The roadmap > > centers on refactoring the internal security model and strengthening > > the underlying web application framework. Hopefully there is plenty in > > here for everyone, users and developers alike. > > > > http://blog.daemon.com.au/go/blog-post/farcry-4-1-roadmap-for-fortress > > > > Comments welcomed! > > > > -- geoffhttp://www.daemon.com.au/ > > > > > -- AJ Mercer Web Log: http://webonix.net --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "farcry-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
