[farcry-dev] Re: PLP storage thought...

[Michael @Four Eyes]

Title: Message

Oh  sorry, my misunderstanding -- Regards, Michael     "Lucas Sherwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi Michael, it is not the PLP steps nor the definition that is the problem. it is the tempoary object that is created during a PLP edit that I am interested in moving.   L. -----Original Message----- From: Michael @Four Eyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 July 2003 22:22 To: FarCry Developers Subject: [farcry-dev] Re: PLP storage thought... You can add PLPs to the application directory.  With in the Types directory you can add PLPs -- Regards, Michael     "Lucas Sherwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hey guys (esp daemon guys!), I have been thing about shared FarCry implementations (mainly at ISPs where you might not have access to the core farcry bits)   What do you think about adding the PLP directory to the project directory instead of the core?   Ie application.fourq.plpstorage points to "farcry_projectname/PLPs"   In this way each app then controls its own PLP instances and thus a developer that only has access to his app instance can remove dead/unwanted PKP instances...   Thoughts?   L.   -- Lucas Sherwood Evangelist - Server Products Macromedia EMEA   +44 7881 803 170 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   --   This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, copying or transmission of this information is strictly prohibited.  If you received this email in error, please delete all copies and notify us immediately. --- You are currently subscribed to farcry-dev as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- You are currently subscribed to farcry-dev as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]