Geoff, Thanks for your feedback. We need full cross-platform compatibility for the MacIntosh with at least one browser. We would like full cross-browser compatibility as well as improved performance.
I'm not much of a javascript programmer but I may learn a bit more in the very near future :-). The only place for improvement in performance that I've found is specifying more items to exclude in lStripfields when nj:treeData is called. Ideally, the select statements that are executed as a result of calling nj:treeData wouldn't include unneeded fields (or at least not the CLOB fields). Beth On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 15:05:32 +1000, Geoff Bowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Beth Bowden wrote: > > I'm looking at some alternates to the farcry javascript tree. Some > > very low-cost javascript trees are available that claim to work > > cross-platform and cross-browser including Safari, Firefox, ... etc > > with improved performance. > > Unfortunately, you won't find something that will just drop into place > -- the FarCry JS tree is very sophisticated and integrates inherited > permissions and a myriad of other features. What specific issues are > you experiencing with the current tree? It may be much simpler to > improve the current JS tree element rather than replace it. > > > Is it possible to surplant the core javascript tree without breaking > > core? What's the recommended approach. > > There is no way to directly replace the JS tree for site overview in > core. Your best bet would be to simply create a new custom tab and > implement a custom UI to meet your needs. > > -- geoff > http://www.daemon.com.au/ > > > > --- > You are currently subscribed to farcry-dev as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/ > --- You are currently subscribed to farcry-dev as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/
