of course if you did this, the only way of actually flushing whole
blocks of content would be in the admin pages. No harm in that tho?


On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 18:37:45 +1000, Gavin Cooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> 
> It wouldn't be too big of a job to change this.
> 
> When you preview something at the moment it passes in a "flushcache=1"
> to the site. This then (as far as i can see) translates to
> request.mode.flushcache=true.
> 
> Then around line 85 of /farcry_code/tags/webskin/cache.cfm
> it invokes the flushcache cfc.
> 
> It flushes a whole block of caching. Whereas all you want it to do it
> flush one cachename, so that when this page is displayed it generates
> the content again.
> 
> This should (totally untested) work like this:
> 
> Line 89 of /farcry_code/tags/webskin/cache.cfm
> 
> <cfinvokeargument name="lcachenames" value="#attributes.cacheName#"/>
> 
> But you'll have to have a closer look.
> 
> HTH
> 
> Gav
>

---
You are currently subscribed to farcry-dev as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/

Reply via email to