On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 10:23:44AM +0530, Mohan Kumar M wrote: > On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 10:43:33AM +0900, Horms wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 02:32:45PM +0530, Mohan Kumar M wrote: > > > I hope that /proc/iomem should export IO related memory stuff only. It's > > > the case in PPC64. Isnt' it? > > > > Does that imply that it isn't the case on i386/x86_64? > > > > I meant /proc/iomem should reflect only IO related memory stuff. PPC64 > follows that. > > > I think that some way of representing the crashkernel area consistently > > accross all architectures is a reasonable goal. But I'm not sure of the > > reason for the differences. > > What about creating kexec/kdump related entries in /proc or /sys ? > Already there is a patch by Jeff Moyer to create the following boolean > entries: /sys/kernel/kexec_loaded and /sys/kernel/kexec_crash_loaded
That sounds like a good idea to me. -- Horms H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/ W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/ _______________________________________________ fastboot mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/fastboot
