Sorry just to add to that last post...look at ART26.2
On Sep 29, 5:58 pm, the gaffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yup...it only applies to ART26 references.
>
> On Sep 29, 5:56 pm, tiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hey there
>
> > I have a very question that may be very silly, in relation to the one
> > judgment rule under Art 34.4.4 and in relation to the article 26
> > procedure, i.e. Casey suggests that by not disclosing or publishing
> > dissents, it inhibits the development of constitutional
> > jurisprudence.
>
> > Why then do notes and books refer to certain judges (dissenting) and
> > in the judgments of more than one judges are available when you read
> > the original judgment.
>
> > Am I missing something really basic??!!!- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1
Study Group" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.ie/group/FE-1-Study-Group?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
