Yup...it only applies to ART26 references.
On Sep 29, 5:56 pm, tiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey there
>
> I have a very question that may be very silly, in relation to the one
> judgment rule under Art 34.4.4 and in relation to the article 26
> procedure, i.e. Casey suggests that by not disclosing or publishing
> dissents, it inhibits the development of constitutional
> jurisprudence.
>
> Why then do notes and books refer to certain judges (dissenting) and
> in the judgments of more than one judges are available when you read
> the original judgment.
>
> Am I missing something really basic??!!!
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1
Study Group" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.ie/group/FE-1-Study-Group?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
