well section B got no paper for a good 3minutes..it was a joke. and
the invigilator in our section was away with the fairies..i had my
hand up in the air for a good 2mins before she spotted me and then she
had to tip off to the other end of the hall for the paper-way to go!
and i was seriously stuck for time as it was

On Oct 1, 4:31 pm, Fern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey,
> I thought it was a nice enough paper. The examiner seems to take the
> questions from a small enough pool of topics. I was delighted to get
> the three questions on directors, then I did the retention of title
> clauses but there was a bit of a spin on the question because of the
> reference to registering the charges. Finally I did the duties of
> receivers question which in hindsight might have been a mistake
> because it was in three parts and I was only strong on the first part
> and had to recycle the caselaw for the other two bits. I find it hard
> with company to get the measure of the examiner at all - I am just
> hoping and praying for 50% and if I don't get it, I'll be going for a
> recheck.
> What was the story with Section B in the RDS - what were the extra
> three minutes for? Was it something bad?
>
> On Oct 1, 4:01 pm, Shellie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi there,
>
> > I would think that the results will be out the first week in December
> > and probably Wed the 3rd- Obviously I don't know for sure but for the
> > last 2 sittings they've been the same. I definitely wouldn't worry too
> > much about today's exam- you absolutely never know how they're going
> > to go... Company was the first one I ever sat and I was absolutely
> > convinced I'd failed it and got 56 in the end- much to my surprise! If
> > you can, the best approach is to put it out of your mind andd
> > concentrate on the next one and I know that's easier said than done!!
>
> > On Oct 1, 3:41 pm, Perdy22 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Don't be so hard on yourself you never know what way it will go. I had
> > > two good questions in tort last time and hit and miss info after that
> > > and I got 51. Saying that I have to repeat that again cos I only got
> > > two out of 4 last time round. Did you only do three and a half
> > > questions. Were you not able to attempt two more? I'm just wondering
> > > how you felt about the receivership question. Was there an issue
> > > regarding the receiver making preferential payments under s. 285 or is
> > > that not relevant. I just put that in in the end.
>
> > > Any way best of luck. Do you know when the results are??
>
> > > On Oct 1, 3:17 pm, BailOut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > what did everyone think of co. i did the s150 q, fiduciary duties,
> > > > receivership and refusal to reg shares- i couldn't do the pre emption
> > > > part....so really only 3.5 qs-no way to pass with just that..or does
> > > > anyone know otherwise??- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 
Study Group" group.
 To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.ie/group/FE-1-Study-Group?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to