hi everyone

i  am so  puttinng my neck on the line....
but hey .... i have thought and thought about posting here since i was an
FE!1 canditate..
where do i   start???



2009/3/7 Joan Keena <[email protected]>

> Got the new Nutshells, there is obviously a good bit which is similar,
> however the chapter on sep of powers is good and I think this book is well
> worth €25, well actually il confirm that after the exam!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of the gaffer
> Sent: 06 March 2009 16:00
> To: FE-1 Study Group
> Subject: Re: Constitutional!!!
>
>
> I've just realised that there's a new nutshell...To anyone that has
> it:Is there any big changes from the last one?I've looked at the
> publisher's website,says the new edition deals with changes on the
> effect of a ruling of unconstitutonality and seperation of powers?
>
> Kind of annoyed I didn't know this sooner,The Casey book is prob a bit
> out of date now as well.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mar 6, 2:59 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Watch for it being out of date, nutshells that is...especially for
> > this subject
> >
> > On Mar 6, 12:31 pm, Bee <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > I was actually thinking about nutshells so will def get it now. I'm
> > > sitting last 4 this time but concentrating on 3 so might just give
> > > Constitutional a go and hope for the best.
> >
> > > Thanks.
> >
> > > On Mar 5, 11:53 am, Elaine <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > Hi guys,
> >
> > > > I got 50 in this last October and relied almost totally on the
> > > > Nutshells - there was a new one published last Summer and I found it
> > > > invaluable. I used the Griffith manual for a few topics, but to be
> > > > honest, I found it fairly unhelpful compared to the manuals for the
> > > > other subjects - there's just too much in it! I went in to the exam
> > > > with quite a basic knowledge of all the topics and some extra
> material
> > > > for the "regular" questions - freedom of expression, locus standi,
> > > > fair procedure etc.
> >
> > > > I wouldn't recommend cutting things down quite as much as I did - I
> > > > was under serious pressure timewise so wasn't left with much choice
> > > > and it's definitely not good for your nerves going into an exam with
> > > > so little prepared! But I did find that the most important thing is
> to
> > > > have a good outline on topics, especially the "rights" and not worry
> > > > too much about having loads of academic commentary and discussion.
> > > > Just being able to identify topics gets you a long way in this exam!
> >
> > > > This is just my experience and Im sure other people will have
> > > > different opinions, so feel free to disagree with me! But as a
> > > > guideline for Bee and Notorious, hopefully this will help.
> >
> > > > On 4 Mar, 15:49, "Notorious B.I.G" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > Sorry I can't be of any help here but it is a good question.
> >
> > > > > It would be interesting to hear from somebody who got a 50% and to
> > > > > know what was the standard of their paper.
> > > > > Just so we know what we're dealing with.
> >
> > > > > Many thanks in advance
> >
> > > > > On Mar 4, 11:19 am, Bee <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > Hi everyone,
> >
> > > > > > Hope the study is going well! Just wondering how people are
> getting on
> > > > > > with Constitutional, I'm really finding it difficult. It's my
> first
> > > > > > time doing it, any tips on how to approach it?- Hide quoted text
> -
> >
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 
Study Group" group.
 To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.ie/group/FE-1-Study-Group?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to