thought it was grand
On Mar 30, 5:37 pm, b05bf1e4 <[email protected]> wrote:
> I thought it was an easy paper myself...i've never done any prep
> courses, but it was pretty obvious that some questions were going to
> come up. I could have done all eight, (except for that Hastings
> question) but in the end i decided to do the 2/3 question, campus oil
> question, knowing receipt/assistance, tracing and the problem question
> on Strong v Bird (which took me a couple of minutes to figure out, but
> once you did, it was probably the easiest question on the paper...)
>
> On Mar 30, 4:20 pm, nilomu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > i was really happy with the exam paper, everything the guy in Griffith
> > said in his first lecture came up and as I was studying it myself i
> > just went on his pointers. he even got the do 2/3 question right. i
> > was actually just really lucky. did the anton piller order, tracing,
> > undue influence, trusteeship and the 2/3 question. they were fairly
> > strightforward i thought.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1
Study Group" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.ie/group/FE-1-Study-Group?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
