Hey just wondering how people answered the Injunctions essay part A, the one that cited Campus Oil and Cynamide-seemed to be a bit of disagreement over the best way to approach it and i was just wondering what people did?
On Mar 30, 9:28 pm, LDGantly <[email protected]> wrote: > thought it was grand > > On Mar 30, 5:37 pm, b05bf1e4 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I thought it was an easy paper myself...i've never done any prep > > courses, but it was pretty obvious that some questions were going to > > come up. I could have done all eight, (except for that Hastings > > question) but in the end i decided to do the 2/3 question, campus oil > > question, knowing receipt/assistance, tracing and the problem question > > on Strong v Bird (which took me a couple of minutes to figure out, but > > once you did, it was probably the easiest question on the paper...) > > > On Mar 30, 4:20 pm, nilomu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > i was really happy with the exam paper, everything the guy in Griffith > > > said in his first lecture came up and as I was studying it myself i > > > just went on his pointers. he even got the do 2/3 question right. i > > > was actually just really lucky. did the anton piller order, tracing, > > > undue influence, trusteeship and the 2/3 question. they were fairly > > > strightforward i thought. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.ie/group/FE-1-Study-Group?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
