Personally, I think a potential way to solve the problem would be to prohibit people without apprenticeships sitting the FE1s until they produce written evidence of offer/acceptance thereof. This is my first time sitting the exams and i am absolutely astounded by the numbers present at each sitting. Surely no more than 20-25% have apprenticeships? (Even thats probably optimistic considering 3 from 70 in my class managed to secure something over the year). If you have an apprenticeship lined up, then I think there should be no restrictions on anyone sitting the exams/entering blackhall, regardless of whether that person is law/non-law.
On Apr 3, 12:01 am, nilomu <[email protected]> wrote: > "non-law graduates should be required to sit a diploma course, be it > a > year or two years in the Law Society" > > can you give me a valid reason why??? not that it matters but i have a > 2 year law diploma done anyway after my degree but i fail to see how > it makes a difference - if you can pass the fe1s theres no reason why > you can't do well in Blackhall. why try to cut people out of a > profession just because they are not law grads? why make it easier for > law grads? just curious..... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.ie/group/FE-1-Study-Group?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
