Surely if a law grad does a degree he will have a better chance of passing (because he/she have been doing the subjects for three/four years)? That much has been said already.
If non-law grads are "clogging" up the place of the law grads then why do employers take so many of these non-law grads on? They don't seem to mind people with music degrees who have passed the fe1's and gone through blackhall representing someone. In fact in my own case my past life is of massive benefit to me because of the legal field i work in and as much was said to me in my interview. Just because i didn't want to be a lawyer at 17 when i filled out my CAO shouldn't have to make me drop out of employment and do a Diploma course or what not. On Apr 3, 12:37 pm, LDGantly <[email protected]> wrote: > well said kenno > > On Apr 3, 12:32 pm, kenno1888 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hey nilomu, > > Seeing as curious, I will offer you a reason why. Take professions > > like Doctors and Pharmacists as an example. If you dont posses a > > fundemental degree in either medicine or pharmacy you can not practice > > in those fields period. Admittedly, altohugh this will be widely > > criticised and challenged, legal fees are relatively high in this > > country if one considers the overall charges on the whole looking at > > conveyancing fees etc... Now, speaking hypotethically, take for > > example a person who goes to a solicitor in order to be represented on > > a criminal issue, lets say the solicitor they get is not up to scratch > > and they still have to pay argumentally high rates to their solicitor, > > do you honestly think that they would be happy to find out that the > > solicitor that represented them had a MUSIC degree???? > > Just a hypotethical example but I mean come on, it does not take a > > genius to see why those holding themselves out as being Legal > > representitives for a person, perhaps on issues as fundemental and as > > serious as ones persons civil liberties, should at least posses an > > undergrad degree in that professional field. > > > I hope that at least helped to satisfy your curiosity in some way!!! > > > On 3 Apr, 00:01, nilomu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > "non-law graduates should be required to sit a diploma course, be it > > > a > > > year or two years in the Law Society" > > > > can you give me a valid reason why??? not that it matters but i have a > > > 2 year law diploma done anyway after my degree but i fail to see how > > > it makes a difference - if you can pass the fe1s theres no reason why > > > you can't do well in Blackhall. why try to cut people out of a > > > profession just because they are not law grads? why make it easier for > > > law grads? just curious..... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.ie/group/FE-1-Study-Group?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
