Hey, Didn't actually sit the exam today but from what I'm seeing here I think the moped case is to do with Comm v Italy.
It's a brand new case (10 February) dealing with whether the control of the use of a product comes within Keck or Art 28. Here's a note about it:http://eulaw.typepad.com/eulawblog/2009/02/free- movement-of-goods-motorcycle-trailers-product-use-and-road-safety-case- c-11005.html Extremely unfair to ask questions about such new cases. For what it's worth I think EU is the hardest paper but if you make an attempt at the question I think he marks fairly. On Apr 3, 9:57 pm, Richard Power <[email protected]> wrote: > i stayed completey clear of that question looked horrific!as did most of them! > > anyone do question on the workers rights to reside etc spouse etc, how did > evryone approach this one?? > > objective justification few cases etc?i didn really mention the directive > > > Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 13:54:22 -0700 > > Subject: Re: EU Post Mortem > > From: [email protected] > > To: [email protected] > > > Thank god you guys agree that it was a nightmare of a paper...I'm > > still completely shocked by it - I have read through my notes again > > and I still can't see how you were supposed to answer the goods > > question - what has mopets towing trailers got to do with restriction > > on movement of goods? Can anyone shed some light on that quetions > > please cos I'm completely at a loss!! > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get 30 Free Emoticons for your Windows Live > Messengerhttp://www.livemessenger-emoticons.com/funfamily/en-ie/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.ie/group/FE-1-Study-Group?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
