Hey,

Didn't actually sit the exam today but from what I'm seeing here I
think the moped case is to do with Comm v Italy.

It's a brand new case (10 February) dealing with whether the control
of the use of a product comes within Keck or Art 28.

Here's a note about it:http://eulaw.typepad.com/eulawblog/2009/02/free-
movement-of-goods-motorcycle-trailers-product-use-and-road-safety-case-
c-11005.html

Extremely unfair to ask questions about such new cases. For what it's
worth I think EU is the hardest paper but if you make an attempt at
the question I think he marks fairly.

On Apr 3, 9:57 pm, Richard Power <[email protected]> wrote:
> i stayed completey clear of that question looked horrific!as did most of them!
>
> anyone do question on the workers rights to reside etc spouse etc, how did 
> evryone approach this one??
>
> objective justification few cases etc?i didn really mention the directive
>
> > Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 13:54:22 -0700
> > Subject: Re: EU Post Mortem
> > From: [email protected]
> > To: [email protected]
>
> > Thank god you guys agree that it was a nightmare of a paper...I'm
> > still completely shocked by it - I have read through my notes again
> > and I still can't see how you were supposed to answer the goods
> > question - what has mopets towing trailers got to do with restriction
> > on movement of goods? Can anyone shed some light on that quetions
> > please cos I'm completely at a loss!!
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get 30 Free Emoticons for your Windows Live 
> Messengerhttp://www.livemessenger-emoticons.com/funfamily/en-ie/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 
Study Group" group.
 To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.ie/group/FE-1-Study-Group?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to