Will post summary for you, but despite what examiner says it wasn't on point for that ridiculous q1 at all. It hardly has any law referred to in it and simply says its possible for a college to make a unilateral offer about an exam process, accepted by starting the process. The real issue in q1 was no more than what were the terms of the contract. I suspect the examiner didnt really appreciate this. will give u more detail later.
B Sent using Vodafone Business Email -----Original Message----- From: "Ruddy" <[email protected]> Sent: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:07:08 -0700 (PDT) To: "FE-1 Study Group" <[email protected]> Received: 06-Oct-2009 22:07:11 +0000 Subject: Contract 'Tansey' case Anyone have any information re this case. I think its in the offer/ acceptance area, maybe legitmate expectation. It was relevant in Question 1 April 2009. Thanks --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.ie/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
