Me too. Will elaborate later. Sent using Vodafone Business Email
-----Original Message----- From: "Ruddy" <[email protected]> Sent: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 00:36:25 -0700 (PDT) To: "FE-1 Study Group" <[email protected]> Received: 07-Oct-2009 07:36:27 +0000 Subject: Re: Contract 'Tansey' case Cheers Brian, That question has been bothering me since April! On Oct 7, 8:11 am, Brian Foley <[email protected]> wrote: > Will post summary for you, but despite what examiner says it wasn't on point > for that ridiculous q1 at all. It hardly has any law referred to in it and > simply says its possible for a college to make a unilateral offer about an > exam process, accepted by starting the process. The real issue in q1 was no > more than what were the terms of the contract. I suspect the examiner didnt > really appreciate this. will give u more detail later. > > B > > Sent using Vodafone Business Email > > -----Original Message----- > > From: "Ruddy" <[email protected]> > Sent: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:07:08 -0700 (PDT) > To: "FE-1 Study Group" <[email protected]> > > Received: 06-Oct-2009 22:07:11 +0000 > Subject: Contract 'Tansey' case > > Anyone have any information re this case. I think its in the offer/ > acceptance area, maybe legitmate expectation. It was relevant in > Question 1 April 2009. > > Thanks --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.ie/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
