thank you for your help On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 10:38 PM, Denham Legend <[email protected]>wrote:
> Anne relied on her grandfather's representation that he would leave > her the studfarm to her detriment by staying in Ireland to look after > him and taking on a business course. An equity arises in > proprietarietary estoppel compelling the Grandfather to leave her the > farm. Eric is a mere volunteer so cannot have taken the land free of > the equity. The courts will transfer legal title to Anne. > > That is without the necessary citations and you could inquire as to > the sufficiency of the representation, whether the reliance was > sufficient and whether the award should be in compensation of her > reliance or to complete the representation. > > On Feb 21, 1:03 am, "Nicola" <[email protected]> wrote: > > yeah sorry heres the question > > > > Anne's grandfather died recently, leaving behind a stud farm and > adjoining > > lands. > > > > Some years ago, when Anne finished school, she was considering emigrating > in > > order to find work. Upon hearing this, her grandfather indicated to her > that > > he would devise the studfarm and adjoining lands in her name in his will, > if > > she stayed in Ireland and took care of him. > > > > Anne agreed to do so and minded her grandfather untill his death. Last > year > > she undertook a busniess course in order to assist her in the management > of > > the studfarm in the future. She met the cost of the course herself. > > > > It transpires that Annes Grandfather has devised the studfarm and land to > > his favourite Grandson, Eric. Anne feels aggrieved and seeks your advice > on > > whether she has any claim over the property. > > > > Advise Anne. > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "orange" <[email protected]> > > To: "FE-1 Study Group" <[email protected]> > > Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 11:54 PM > > Subject: Re: solution/sample answer > > > > > HI Nicola, are you referring to Equity? I don't know the question I'm > > > afraid but I did Equity in the last session and made a lot of notes in > > > relation to past papers so I might be able to help a bit if you post > > > up the question. Best of luck. > > > > > On 20 Feb, 18:16, Nicola_Roe <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Hi > > > > >> Has any body got the solution or sample answer to the october paper > > >> 2001 question number 5 on proprietary estoppel? > > > > >> thanks > > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > > "FE-1 Study Group" group. > > > To post to this group, send an email to > [email protected]. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected]<fe-1-study-group%[email protected]> > . > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB.- Hide quoted > text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "FE-1 Study Group" group. > To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<fe-1-study-group%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB. > > -- Kind Regards, Nicola Roe -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB.
