Hi,

I have no materials on mergers but found this which gives a very broad
outline of the procedures used and has footnotes of cases to back up
statements,

better than nothing!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Community_merger_law

On Mar 22, 11:57 am, Buster <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks.  My fear is that he has added it for a reason so might try to
> cover Mergers at least!  Grey, it is also my last exam and without
> doubt I am finding it the worst one... so much to cover... Fingers
> crossed for next Thursday.. do NOT want to have to go back to do this
> one again!!
>
> thanks for advice.
>
> On Mar 22, 8:50 am, "Brian Foley BL" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > My instinct in all things would be that people don't do things for no reason
> > at all.  If the EU examiner (unlike many of the other examiners) sat down,
> > reviewed his syllabus, and put an additional section on it, I'd assume he
> > did so "deliberately, purposefully" (Matrix has been on a lot recently...).
>
> > Whether or not it is on the exam, I'd say there is absolutely no basis for
> > any assertion that it would not appear on this exam simply because it is new
> > on the syllabus.  Rather, the same factor could be an equally plausible
> > basis for assuming it would be on the exam.  A lot of these tips appear
> > based on assumptions about how the examiners behave which simply have no
> > basis at all.  If one could show that in the past, every time the examiner
> > made an "addition" it took two sittings to appear on the paper, it would be
> > another thing, but I wouldn't rely on assumptions like that - not with these
> > exams.
>
> > Regards
>
> > Brian
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected]
>
> > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Grey
> > Sent: 22 March 2010 08:29
> > To: FE-1 Study Group
> > Subject: Re: HELP ....EU!!!
>
> > Well I haven't covered any of those - mergers was just added to the
> > cirriculum wasn't it?  Our guy said he didn't think it would appear so
> > soon but of course that's just his guess/opinion.  I'd be interested
> > to hear people's comments although I don't know where I'd find the
> > time to cover any more than I have - it's my last exam and I'm finding
> > it much more difficult than the others (althought I think you feel
> > that way about every one of these monsters).
>
> > Anyone any thoughts?
>
> > On Mar 21, 7:33 pm, Buster <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Anyone got any ideas which of the following topics to cover (if any!)
>
> > > Brussels I
> > > Control of Concentrations/Mergers
> > > State Aid
>
> > > Does anyone have an idea which ones are most likely to appear on
> > > exam??!
>
> > > Thanks
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "FE-1 Study Group" group.
> > To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group 
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB.
>
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG -www.avg.com
> > Version: 8.5.437 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2761 - Release Date: 03/21/10
> > 07:33:00- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 
Study Group" group.
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB.

Reply via email to