I have some notes if you want me to email to you? On Mar 22, 12:07 pm, Ruddy <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have no materials on mergers but found this which gives a very broad > outline of the procedures used and has footnotes of cases to back up > statements, > > better than nothing! > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Community_merger_law > > On Mar 22, 11:57 am, Buster <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Thanks. My fear is that he has added it for a reason so might try to > > cover Mergers at least! Grey, it is also my last exam and without > > doubt I am finding it the worst one... so much to cover... Fingers > > crossed for next Thursday.. do NOT want to have to go back to do this > > one again!! > > > thanks for advice. > > > On Mar 22, 8:50 am, "Brian Foley BL" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > My instinct in all things would be that people don't do things for no > > > reason > > > at all. If the EU examiner (unlike many of the other examiners) sat down, > > > reviewed his syllabus, and put an additional section on it, I'd assume he > > > did so "deliberately, purposefully" (Matrix has been on a lot > > > recently...). > > > > Whether or not it is on the exam, I'd say there is absolutely no basis for > > > any assertion that it would not appear on this exam simply because it is > > > new > > > on the syllabus. Rather, the same factor could be an equally plausible > > > basis for assuming it would be on the exam. A lot of these tips appear > > > based on assumptions about how the examiners behave which simply have no > > > basis at all. If one could show that in the past, every time the examiner > > > made an "addition" it took two sittings to appear on the paper, it would > > > be > > > another thing, but I wouldn't rely on assumptions like that - not with > > > these > > > exams. > > > > Regards > > > > Brian > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [email protected] > > > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Grey > > > Sent: 22 March 2010 08:29 > > > To: FE-1 Study Group > > > Subject: Re: HELP ....EU!!! > > > > Well I haven't covered any of those - mergers was just added to the > > > cirriculum wasn't it? Our guy said he didn't think it would appear so > > > soon but of course that's just his guess/opinion. I'd be interested > > > to hear people's comments although I don't know where I'd find the > > > time to cover any more than I have - it's my last exam and I'm finding > > > it much more difficult than the others (althought I think you feel > > > that way about every one of these monsters). > > > > Anyone any thoughts? > > > > On Mar 21, 7:33 pm, Buster <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Anyone got any ideas which of the following topics to cover (if any!) > > > > > Brussels I > > > > Control of Concentrations/Mergers > > > > State Aid > > > > > Does anyone have an idea which ones are most likely to appear on > > > > exam??! > > > > > Thanks > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > > "FE-1 Study Group" group. > > > To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > [email protected]. > > > For more options, visit this group > > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB. > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > > Checked by AVG -www.avg.com > > > Version: 8.5.437 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2761 - Release Date: 03/21/10 > > > 07:33:00- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB.
