I thought the paper overall was fair. Most of the questions were simply rehashes of past questions were equally distributed over the syllabus. Not everything I was hoping for came up but hey, what can you do? I avoided that Question 2 like the plague. No idea what the examiner was looking for- seemed to combine elements from different topics. Normally, with those odd questions, the marks go for how you improvise an answer.
On Mar 22, 5:12 pm, Orla Fitzpatrick <[email protected]> wrote: > i was ok....i didnt get it finished, only four done but i was happy with > what i wrote! um for Q2 i wrote about getting a quia timet injunction but > then said that bcuz their rights wer small and compensatable and estimatable > in that they wud prob just get their money back for the trip (the rules in > Shelfer v. City of london Electric Co) they would prob get damages??? > > im prob waaaay off but thats what i wrote? > > > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:29 PM, wyckham <[email protected]> wrote: > > what did everyone think of equity today? > > anyone know what ques 2 was on? > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "FE-1 Study Group" group. > > To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<fe-1-study-group%[email protected]> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB.
