YESSSSSS!!!!! thanks guys!! On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 7:43 PM, j s <[email protected]> wrote:
> Q.2 seems to be about QT injunctions alright, I also tossed in some > specific performance because that seems to be the main cause of action. > Quite happy with the exam, was surprised that an entire question came up on > joint deposits and nothing on tracing or charitable trusts. > > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 7:19 PM, wyckham <[email protected]> wrote: > >> think your right orla it seems to be quia timet injunctions on doing >> the post mortem, so annoyed because i had it studied but was afraid to >> chance it in case it was specific performance and i was completely >> wrong!!! >> oh well got four good answers and a pretty pathetic attempt at a fifth >> but fingers crossed i passed it >> >> On Mar 22, 5:54 pm, Denham Legend <[email protected]> wrote: >> > I thought the paper overall was fair. Most of the questions were >> > simply rehashes of past questions were equally distributed over the >> > syllabus. Not everything I was hoping for came up but hey, what can >> > you do? I avoided that Question 2 like the plague. No idea what the >> > examiner was looking for- seemed to combine elements from different >> > topics. Normally, with those odd questions, the marks go for how you >> > improvise an answer. >> > >> > On Mar 22, 5:12 pm, Orla Fitzpatrick <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > i was ok....i didnt get it finished, only four done but i was happy >> with >> > > what i wrote! um for Q2 i wrote about getting a quia timet injunction >> but >> > > then said that bcuz their rights wer small and compensatable and >> estimatable >> > > in that they wud prob just get their money back for the trip (the >> rules in >> > > Shelfer v. City of london Electric Co) they would prob get damages??? >> > >> > > im prob waaaay off but thats what i wrote? >> > >> > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:29 PM, wyckham <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > what did everyone think of equity today? >> > > > anyone know what ques 2 was on? >> > >> > > > -- >> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups >> > > > "FE-1 Study Group" group. >> > > > To post to this group, send an email to >> [email protected]. >> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > > > [email protected]<fe-1-study-group%[email protected]><fe-1-study-group%2Bunsubscrib >> �[email protected]> >> > > > . >> > > > For more options, visit this group at >> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB.-Hidequoted >> > > >text - >> > >> > > - Show quoted text - >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "FE-1 Study Group" group. >> To post to this group, send an email to [email protected] >> . >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]<fe-1-study-group%[email protected]> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB. >> >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "FE-1 Study Group" group. > To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<fe-1-study-group%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB.
