how bout the speed bump question. i answered mainly on Novus Actus, with a bit of contributory neg thrown in if Novus Actus fails. Then again it's probably products liability or something so im in serious trouble right?!
Also, answered the restaurant question on overall negligence, with the focus mainly on Res Ipsa. Is this right?? On 27 Sep, 13:51, Orla Fitzpatrick <[email protected]> wrote: > as the saying goes- how was that for u??!! > > please tell me q. 1 was defamation??? > wasnt so sure what q. 6 was??? vic lib??? didnt like it anyway. > and argh the animal one, i looked at it and said shoulda studied the > animals? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB.
