Yeah was wondering about the speed bumps myself, I did gen neg principles, but some have said occupiers liability??
On 27 Sep 2010, at 14:14, ag <[email protected]> wrote: > how bout the speed bump question. i answered mainly on Novus Actus, > with a bit of contributory neg thrown in if Novus Actus fails. Then > again it's probably products liability or something so im in serious > trouble right?! > > Also, answered the restaurant question on overall negligence, with the > focus mainly on Res Ipsa. Is this right?? > > > On 27 Sep, 13:51, Orla Fitzpatrick <[email protected]> wrote: >> as the saying goes- how was that for u??!! >> >> please tell me q. 1 was defamation??? >> wasnt so sure what q. 6 was??? vic lib??? didnt like it anyway. >> and argh the animal one, i looked at it and said shoulda studied the >> animals? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "FE-1 Study Group" group. > To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB.
