Idi dnot do Q6, thought is was sht - but i thought in the exam that
i may be an employee/employer situation - given the direction con
control and so forth - plus vv /ialbility would come to play - in
addition to it being a causation question.


thought the med neg was a good question -

On Sep 27, 5:04 pm, Aengus Gormley <[email protected]> wrote:
> i suppose all of negligence principles are relevant. i just sort of figured
> it all seems like fairly straightforward negligence  apart from the
> causation so that's why i focused on novus acteus. either way i hope they
> throw a few pity marks in my direction!
>
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Orla Fitzpatrick <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>
>
> > i did cauation for the speed bumps??material contribution mcghee whisler
> > fairchild all that??? i didnt get it finished ended in bullet
> > points thou..??? [?]
> > q.6 was vile.
>
> > On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Michael Quinlan 
> > <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> >> Yeah was wondering about the speed bumps myself, I did gen neg principles,
> >> but some have said occupiers liability??
>
> >> On 27 Sep 2010, at 14:14, ag <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> > how bout the speed bump question. i answered mainly on Novus Actus,
> >> > with a bit of contributory neg thrown in if Novus Actus fails. Then
> >> > again it's probably products liability or something so im in serious
> >> > trouble right?!
>
> >> > Also, answered the restaurant question on overall negligence, with the
> >> > focus mainly on Res Ipsa. Is this right??
>
> >> > On 27 Sep, 13:51, Orla Fitzpatrick <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >> as the saying goes- how was that for u??!!
>
> >> >> please tell me q. 1 was defamation???
> >> >> wasnt so sure what q. 6 was??? vic lib??? didnt like it anyway.
> >> >> and argh the animal one, i looked at it and said shoulda studied the
> >> >> animals?
>
> >> > --
> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >> Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group.
> >> > To post to this group, send an email to
> >> [email protected].
> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> [email protected]<fe-1-study-group%[email protected]>
> >> .
> >> > For more options, visit this group at
> >>http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB.
>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >> "FE-1 Study Group" group.
> >> To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]
> >> .
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> [email protected]<fe-1-study-group%[email protected]>
> >> .
> >> For more options, visit this group at
> >>http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB.
>
> >  --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "FE-1 Study Group" group.
> > To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<fe-1-study-group%[email protected]>
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB.
>
>
>
>  1A5.png
> < 1KViewDownload- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 
Study Group" group.
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB.

Reply via email to